Comment

Comment by Jadranka on March 20, 2014 at 3:46am

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <JUST-CIVIL-COOP@ec.europa.eu>
Date: Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:21 AM
Subject: Ares (2014)814268
To: mr.nigel.cooper@gmail.com
Cc: JUST-CIVIL-COOP@ec.europa.eu


Ares (2014) 814268



Dear Mr Cooper,



Please find attached the letter signed by our Head of Unit, Mr Michael Shotter, regarding your letter of 14 February 2014.





cid:image001.gif@01CDCCBE.2776C4C0



European Commission

Directorate-General for Justice

Civil justice policy Unit

Comment by Jadranka on March 20, 2014 at 3:44am

Sir ~Madam,

Thank you for your informative letter for which I now respond.

Attached for your reading is the certified original judgement supplemented by Article 42.

Attached is a FAKE document claimed to be the lawful judgement of the UK stating refused, and, further more revoking any rights of appeal? I have asked on multiple occasions for the a certified original showing the wet signature, though it has failed to materialize.

Sir ~Madam,

Attached is a second FAKE document claimed to be a lawful judgement (in private without attendance without evidence) against the Magna Cart 15th June 1215 (sub article 29). Where in this document should I attempt to enforce my judgment then I would go to prison.. Force exile!

Both documents carry the Royal Privy seal of Queen Elizabeth II High Court, (Families division). Both documents represent the office of legal advise for the UK who, given their positions of office and access to the law would have clearly known that in their actions they are not only breaching the Hague Convention but also breaching (EU) treaty and law to name but a few.

Attached is a formal letter that I addressed to the President of the European Union laying out my claim in statement of oath.

I am also in possession of a formal certified official letter from HM Queen QEII declaring her direct refusal to obey the law, though it did "suggest" that she would instruct the Lord Chancellor to deal with the matter. I also have a letter from the office of the Lord Chancellor refusing to obey the law, though it passes authority to the UK courts, I also have a letter from the head of the UK judicial system who also refuses to obey the law claiming that I should appear be him, I also have a letter from the Arch Bishop of Canterbury (holder of the law and faith) refusing to assist and or obey the law.

Given the context of 11.7 / 11.8 of The Hague convention and Article 42 I have no need to appear before any person.

I have so many documents it is hard to submit to you what I think is pertinent; if you were to ask me "Have you got (xyz)" then I will send it to you. I have more than 15,000 documents. Which ones do you want? I can if you wish grant by power of attorney access to my Gmail account so you may retrieve ANY document you feel constructive, I will also grant to you access to my PC and hard drives so that you can extract any document that you feel is beneficial to resolving this matter and enforcing my judgement in full.

Respectfully

Nigel

Comment by Jadranka on March 19, 2014 at 2:23am

H O R R O R in the UK in 21st century
the UK don't obey International law

Please sign and share, make it viral... thank you all

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc8t4V9ReRc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JGj0M8-CVI&feature=youtu.be

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/saving-bailie

http://ukobeythelaw.wordpress.com/

https://www.facebook.com/.../savingbailiekatec.../.......

Who has the right to abuse my daughter and myself in this manor?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JGj0M8-CVI&feature=youtu.be....

https://www.facebook.com/.../UK-Caught.../620193324674077
UK Caught Stealing Children

The pen is mightier than the sword!

Two and a half years ago, on the 14th March 2012, I was awarded a judgement in my favor; an “Omnipotent”, [A perfect] judgement to be more accurate. The judgement, on first viewing is powerful, but read it again! Then read it again and something will come to light, the power of the written word.

Before I get started on the destruction of the U.K. you will need to read all of my post’s, view all of my video’s, read my C.V. and career history. To put it bluntly; I am not a “Crank”, a “Nut job”, or “Mentally impaired or unstable”, (though there are those in the UK who would love to lock me up and declare that I am). The information is readily available and located at:

My post’s, here! http://www.ukobeythelaw.wordpress.com/

My video’s http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfwzYvjo5oSVoSipATRr4aA

My C.V. and career history http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=3337005&trk=wvmp-profile

Hopefully, you have now taken some time to view and or read the information contained in the above links; so without further add do, let’s get the show on the road!

This is not only about my daughter or only about me, it is about the U.K. obeying the law, all law, the law of man written for man, (and woman)… (not being derogatory in anyway.. just the way it is publicly worded). With that said and done……

Let’s take a look at the judgement:

Page one, the so called cover page; but it is more than that, it is all about how you punctuate a statement and the use of comma’s and semicolons. On the cover page it reads:

We, Albert II, King of Belgium,
To all, present and future, let hereby known :

Looks quite simple at first, now read it again.

We is a collective of more than two, and in the first line where it address’s people it has “3″ commas, so it is talking about more than two just with the separation of comma’s! Thus Albert II in this instance is not the King of Belgium as he is addressed as the King of Belgium in the same line! The only other Albert II within the so called Royal arena is the the crown prince of Monaco! Thus two Royal households from two countries, and that is in the first line! Added to that is the per-cursor of “We”, (more than two), and we’ve proved the two Royal households thus the “We” is “others”, [I'll cover who the others are shortly].

The second line:

To all, present and future, let hereby known:

Take a closer look: “To all” means just that “all“, believe it or not, the UK is part of all, in the same manor as you and I. “present and future“, meaning to each and everyone of us alive today and to every person in the future, [should any person do this again this is the punishment], also to make reference to future, it means that the judgement is placed in trust for all of time. Why place in trust? Many judgements are bound by a stature of limitations of time, unless they are empowered within a trust, then the trust lasts for ever and it is normally bound to a financial transaction, a fund, a charity, a legacy or endowment where the sum in question is substantial, [I'll cover the cost of the judgment later].

The final part of the line is “let hereby known” , not it did NOT say let it be known! To use the phrase let hereby known is to address a law, [look it up, for example the removal of the death sentence uses the let hereby known phrase]. Thus this judgement is a law and to give it a n